 |
 |
|
|
A Namibian Alternative

|
|
When you walk into the Habitat
Research and Development Centre (HRDC), you find
yourself stepping back in awe as you admire the
structural masterpiece that greets you. The centre
is built with virtually zero cost low-grade material
found in rural areas, allowing local residents to be
educated on the use of alternative building supplies
for the construction of affordable homes.
|
|
|
“We were extremely privileged to
have been appointed by project architect Nina Maritz,
as the structural & civil engineer on the assignment,”
explains Rolf Trossbach, senior partner at Bührmann &
Partners, adding that the project was requested by the
Ministry of Local Government and Housing in response
to a design competition that was won in 2002.
“Our task as structural engineers was to assist with
the design of the building using sustainable
alternative materials. This meant that we had to
retrain ourselves to think along unconventional lines
since the project did not require us to conform to
municipal regulations.”
“The use of compressed soil-cement bricks was one of
the most interesting materials that we used. These
bricks were made on site using the Hydraform system; a
patented machine rented from a local builder and
stockpiled sand from Otjomuise a few kilometres away.
The activity was quite labour intensive and required
the bricks to be profiled, dry stacked and then
plastered around window reveals and in corners,” notes
Rolf.

Another interesting building
material was the use of rammed earth. “We used steel
shutters to compress earth into a solid block, and
then preserved the rammed earth by sealing it with
seal oil. The sealant was relatively inexpensive and
preserved the wall from further deterioration,”
explains Rolf. |
|
|
Structures were pre-tested by
constructing sample walls in order to test whether or
not the various components were durable for building
purposes. These structures were designed and detailed
with the help of AllyCAD.
“I remember the first time that we were exposed to the
program. We were given a three-month roads project and
immediately realised that we needed the help of an
extensive computer-aided draughting system in order to
meet our deadline. This led us to acquire AllyCAD,
which we used with great success. Since then we have
used the product on all our projects as it cuts down
on project time and helps us to produce a cost
effective end result.”
Other innovative building materials include the use of
the local invader prosopis tree for shade and security
screens in front of windows and extensions of
overhangs and walkway shading. “A local company cut
timber ‘droppers’ or ‘latte’ from the invader trees in
the valley north of the industrial area. The trees
were then debarked and treated on site by being soaked
in a mixture of old motor oil.”
|
|
 |
“The 'Spanish’ reed found in local
riverbeds was another invader plant that was used. The
reeds were locally harvested by unskilled workers and
were mainly used to provide ceiling walls and cladding
for cupboard units. The ceilings were insulated by
either using old feedbags filled with wool and
lavender in order to prevent moth infestation, or by
using waste polystyrene alternated with layers of
flattened corrugated cardboard boxes,” explains Rolf
adding that the insulation had a minimum thickness of
60mm.
|
|
Rolf is quite proud as he explains
the self-made gabion walls that the team created: “The
large gabion retaining wall was constructed using wire
baskets made on site and concrete bricks and rubble
from a demolition site. The same demolition site also
provided the B-grade steel that was used for steel
windows, columns and roof structures on the building.”
The use of old car tyres gave recycling a new meaning.
“The tyres were used to build the archive walls and
were stacked on top of each other and rammed full of a
soil-cement mixture. Although our use of cement was
restricted, we used small quantities as a binder in
each tyre as the stockpile contained no clay. Tyre
shops currently pay N$7 to dispose of tyres, providing
residents with a useful recycling alternative,”
explains Rolf.
The first phase of the centre which consisted of the
admin wing, was completed in April 2004, while the
public wing was completed in September 2004. “I found
this project particularly enjoyable as it challenged
us to think out of the box and explore our creativity
and imagination. After weeks of planning, testing and
brainstorming, we are extremely pleased with the end
result,” Rolf says with contentment. |
|
|
Last Updated:
August 22, 2005
|
|
|
 |